[HT: James White]
Category Archives: Videos
Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson Debate Video
Here is the video of the debate held at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, PA, between Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson.
Philosophy and Soccer
For those of you who know philosophy and its history, this Monty Python clip is just hilarious! Enjoy!
Barack Obama – “Redistribution of Wealth”
Change? Can I get a, “yes we can”???
Ugh… One things for sure… I don’t want this change, even though I know it’s going to try to be implemented soon. It is truly a sad day when a man like this has been elected President of the US and people barely even heard about this audio before the election day. Well, the people wanted a king… so God gave them one.
Welcome to The Neo-American Union…
Redeeming a song: Hurt
Compare these two music videos and consider what it takes to redeem a song that was originally written to express the hurt and suffering and meaninglessness of life without God. I would love any comments and discussion you have to offer.
- Johnny Cash: Hurt
- Nine Inch Nails: Hurt (original author of song)
Hitchens vs. Wilson: A Collision of Lives – Part II
This post stands as a compilation of the recent debate and commentary on the debate that has been posted by Doug Wilson, Nate Wilson and Christianity Today. Below I have also included links to one of my fellow Bloggers who wrote some good commentary about Presuppositional Apologetics last year during the Christianity Today debate between Wilson and Hitchens.
Here is an interview of Wilson and Hitches on the Debate/Book tour:
by Doug Wilson
by Nate Wilson
Christianity Today Debate – 2007
- “Is Christianity Good for the World?” Part I
- “Is Christianity Good for the World?” Part II
- “Is Christianity Good for the World?” Part III
- “Is Christianity Good for the World?” Part IV
- “Is Christianity Good for the World?” Part V
- “Is Christianity Good for the World?” Part VI
Commentary on the Debate – by James Grant
- Wilson introduces presuppositionalism to Hitchens
- Presuppositionalism 102
- Responses to Wilson vs. Hitchens
- Wilson & Hitchens, Part 3
- Wilson & Hitchens, Part 4
- Wilson & Hitchens, Part 5
- Wilson & Hitchens, Part 6
Here is that awesome video preview of the documentary again:
Here is a link to the published book of the debate hosted by Christianity Today in 2007. You can support out ministry by purchasing this book and others through our book store.
Hitchens vs. Wilson: A Collision of Lives
I have to say, I cannot wait for this to come out on DVD! Enjoy the preview, especially the music and the camera work. 🙂
Here is some more information about it:
Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson squared-off in a recent series of debates over atheism. Hitchens is an atheist with an acerbic wit who thinks Christianity to be a blight on society. Douglas Wilson is a Christian who wants to show the reasonableness of the Christian faith. The video above is a trailer for a forthcoming documentary that describes the debates. (HT: Denny Burk)
Bill Maher and John Piper
You have probably seen by now one of the ads for Bill Maher’s new documentary “Religulous.” If you haven’t seen it, it’s a movie that was produced for the expressed purpose of denigrating religion. The fundamental point seems to be that having faith in any religion is ridiculous—thus “Religulous.” In the trailer for the movie, the following exchange takes place between Maher and a person dressed up like Jesus.
Maher: Why doesn’t [God] just obliterate the devil and therefore get rid of evil in the world?
Jesus Impersonator: He will.
Maher: He will?
Jesus Impersonator: That’s correct.Maher: What’s he waiting for?
The whole point of the exchange is to show how ridiculous it is that the Christian God will not do anything about evil in the world even though He’s supposed to be both good and all-powerful. Even though it’s delivered with sarcastic humor, Maher is asking a serious question. At bottom the exchange is really about the classical question of theodicy, and the whole thing is framed in a way to discredit the Christian faith.
In a recent blog post, John Piper answers Maher’s question, though he doesn’t mention Maher’s name. Nevertheless, the title of Piper’s essay reads like an allusion to “Religulous”: “Why not destroy the devil now?” Piper gives an answer that is (as you might expect) grounded in God’s passion for His own glory. God is most glorified by allowing Satan to remain for a time. He writes:
“The glory of Christ is seen in his absolute right and power to annihilate or incapacitate Satan and all demons. But the reason he refrains from destroying and disabling them altogether is to manifest more clearly his superior beauty and worth. If Christ obliterated all devils and demons now (which he could do), his sheer power would be seen as glorious, but his superior beauty and worth would not shine as brightly as when humans renounce the promises of Satan and take pleasure in the greater glory of Christ.”
Maher’s question deserved a serious answer, and I am grateful that Piper took the time to write one. You should read the rest.
“Why Not Destroy the Devil Now?” – by John Piper (desiringgod.org)