Master’s Seminary Faculty: A Biblical Response to Homosexuality

I just found out that the Master’s Seminary Faculty (John MacArthur’s School) just finished given their weekly lecture series on the topic of Homosexuality and the Bible.

Here is the link to the series and a list of the topics in the series. May God bless you through these lectures!

MP3 List:

2/14/2008 – Biblical Response to Homosexuality
Alex Montoya

2/12/2008 – Parenting and Homosexuality
Rick Holland

2/07/2008 – Marriage and Homosexuality
Irv Busenitz

2/05/2008 – Cultural and Medical Myths about Homosexuality
Michael Grisanti

1/29/2008 – The Bible on Sexuality and Homosexuality
John MacArthur

Nightline Reports: What Happens When You Die?

Video: What Happens When You Die?

New Report: Bishop’s Heaven: Is There Life After the Afterlife?

Nightline did a report yesterday on Bishop Tom Wright’s views on heaven and the afterlife. This interview dealt with the same thing that I post about in an earlier interview this year.

The Interview was good, but I know that they cut out several things that Wright said that could have clarified his views on things. I also didn’t like the way Nightline cast the interview. It sounded as thought Wright was saying that everyone will inherit the new heavens and the new earth, but I know that Wright does not believe that everyone will be saved. Some have accused him of that, but he expressly denies it.

What do you think about the Nightline interview?

McKnight Reviews N.T. Wright’s Latest Book

Surprised by Hope

Scott McKnight of Jesus Creed has reviews N.T. Wright’s latest and second book in Wright’s short trilogy of apologetic work introducing the Christian Faith to readers. This review is helpful and informative. I encourage everyone to read through it and consider purchasing Wright’s new book to read as well. Please let me know your thoughts.

Fathers and Sons

Here is a book review that Justin Taylor mentioned and gave good reviews about. It’s suppose to be the best book review he’s ever read. So, I pass this on to you and encourage you to read the review and see if you feel the same way.

Here is an excerpt from the review…

If asked what is the deepest relationship imaginable, many people would say it is between lovers, or between husbands and wives. The case can be made, however, that from a Christian perspective, no relationship is more mysterious and more wonderful, yet sometimes more troubling, than that of fathers and sons. The depth and wonder begin with all we know of the relationship of God the Father and God the Son, while the troubled aspects stem from the Fall. Consider Absalom’s rebellion against King David in the Old Testament, Edmund Gosse’s exposure of his father Philip, the Oedipal drive in the writings of Sigmund Freud—and now Frank Schaeffer’s Crazy for God, a memoir that is his personal apologia at the expense of his famous father, Francis Schaeffer, who was the founder and leader of the worldwide network of L’Abri communities.

Frank Schaeffer unquestionably adored his father, just as his father passionately adored him. Having lived in their home for more than three years, I have countless memories of this, including the sight of the two of them wrestling on the floor of the living room of their chalet, and ending with a fierce hug. Yet no critic or enemy of Francis Schaeffer has done more damage to his life’s work than his son Frank—a result that one might not be able to infer from many reviews of the memoir, including that which appeared in the previous issue of Books & Culture.

The problem is not so much that Frank exposes and trumpets his parents’ flaws and frailties, or that he skewers them with his characteristic mockery. It is more than that. For all his softening, the portrait he paints amounts to a death-dealing charge of hypocrisy and insincerity at the very heart of their life and work. In Frank’s own words, his parents were “crazy for God.” Their call to the ministry “actually drove them crazy,” so that “religion was actually the source of their tragedy.” His dad was under “the crushing belief that God had ‘called’ him to save the world.” Because of this, his parents were “happiest when farthest away from their missionary work.” Back at their calling, they were “professional proselytizers,” their teaching was “indoctrination,” and it was unclear whether people came to faith or were “brainwashed” and “under the spell” of his parents. Frank’s own arguments in their support, he now says, were a kind of “circus trick.” (more…)

[HT: James Grant]

What should Great Britain do next?

Islamist extremists have infiltrated Government and key public utilities to pass sensitive information to terrorists, the security services have warned.

Counter-terrorism officials say “insiders” or their associates are almost certainly working “undetected” in sensitive posts and are actively supporting the activities of extremists.

In some cases, lifelong relationships between friends or relatives are being exploited to obtain crucial information from those in sensitive posts. (more…)

A brief commentary on the New Testament position regarding Christians marrying non-Christians

Three clarifications before the commentary:

  • The New Testament does not, in any way, advocate a Christian leaving their spouse because their spouse is not a Christian. If a husband or a wife is converted to Jesus, but their spouse remains in unbelief, then it is the Christian spouse who is charged with living a life to the glory of Jesus Christ in hopes that God will use them to also save their spouse.

  • The New Testament seeks to show how Jesus is both fully divine and fully human. This means that any religion that affirms the historical existence of Jesus as a man, yet rejects his divine nature, is not a true religion in their view of God.

  • God is a trinity of persons. In other words, the “Godhead” in the Bible is defined as one God, three persons. Any religion that confuses this or rejects this does not believe in the one true God who created the heavens and the earth.

     

When Paul writes to the Church at Corinth and says, “Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers… What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever?” (2 Cor. 6:14-18) Paul is not defining a ‘believer’ as someone who believes in only one God. Paul is defining a believer as someone who sees Christ as God incarnate, or Christ as the God-man. Paul is talking about someone who believes the Gospel. This means that Paul would not okay a Christian (who believes Jesus is Lord) to marry a non-Christian (who rejects that Jesus is Lord).

If we do not maintain that Jesus reveals to us exactly who God is, then we cannot maintain our identity with Christ. This is the problem that arises when a Christian, who is not married, decides to marry a non-Christian. Their marriage says to the world that Jesus is not the only one who reveals the Triune God to the world. If a Christian marries a Buddhist, that marriage says that Christ and Buddha can equally reveal God to the world. If a Christian marries a Muslim, that marriage says that Christ and Muhammad both equally reveal God to the world.

But Jesus, Buddha, and Muhammad do not all reveal God to the world, only Jesus reveals God to the world. Further, according to other religions – Jesus was only a man; Jesus did not die for sins in order to save those who believe in Him; Jesus was not raised from the dead.

If someone does not believe that Jesus died on a cross and was raised from the dead three days later, then the New Testament says that they are an unbeliever and someone who does not love God. The Gospel is what defines Christianity. Anything less cannot teach the truth about who God is and what he has done to save people from every tribe, nation, and tongue for Himself and for His glory.

This is why Paul says that the mystery of marriage, from the beginning, was to reveal Christ and the Church:

Ephesians 5:25-32: “Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church, because we are members of his body. ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church.

A Christian marrying a non-Christian cannot reveal Christ and the Church. The non-Christian does not believe in Christ or the Church and would never consider doing what Paul says. That is why Paul counsels the Corinthians never to marry an “unbeliever.”

Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life."

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons